<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweden Supports Developing Countries With $1 Billion in Climate Aid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://undersolenmedia.com/blog/causes-blog/climate-change/sweden-supports-developing-countries-with-1-billion-in-climate-aid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://undersolenmedia.com/blog/causes-blog/climate-change/sweden-supports-developing-countries-with-1-billion-in-climate-aid/</link>
	<description>You have the story. We amplify it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: undersolenmedia</title>
		<link>http://undersolenmedia.com/blog/causes-blog/climate-change/sweden-supports-developing-countries-with-1-billion-in-climate-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>undersolenmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undersolenmedia.wordpress.com/?p=376#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a &quot;fast-start&quot; program. Sort of a kick in the climate change pants. Now granted, there&#039;s some discussion around whether it&#039;s enough and whether it&#039;s long term enough, but it&#039;s still putting money towards attacking climate change, not just its effects.

More here:
http://solveclimate.com/blog/20091209/developing-countries-weather-global-warming-cold-shoulders

And I would argue that Sweden has one of the more progressive attitudes towards curbing emissions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a &#8220;fast-start&#8221; program. Sort of a kick in the climate change pants. Now granted, there&#8217;s some discussion around whether it&#8217;s enough and whether it&#8217;s long term enough, but it&#8217;s still putting money towards attacking climate change, not just its effects.</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a href="http://solveclimate.com/blog/20091209/developing-countries-weather-global-warming-cold-shoulders" rel="nofollow">http://solveclimate.com/blog/20091209/developing-countries-weather-global-warming-cold-shoulders</a></p>
<p>And I would argue that Sweden has one of the more progressive attitudes towards curbing emissions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stiv</title>
		<link>http://undersolenmedia.com/blog/causes-blog/climate-change/sweden-supports-developing-countries-with-1-billion-in-climate-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>stiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undersolenmedia.wordpress.com/?p=376#comment-8</guid>
		<description>This seems like a pretty strange strategy and the article you link to doesn&#039;t give much info either--  What does this &#039;aid&#039; look like?  I mean, what does, &#039;help developing countries deal with the effects of climate change&#039; mean?  This is kind of backwards strategy if you ask me--  The developing world is responsible for about 3% of CO2 emissions worldwide yet they are affected.  Seems like Sweden (and any developed nation for that matter) OWES this kind of aid for being the polluters-- not that any developed nation would admit to that.  But that said, I&#039;m not really sure Sweden needs a pat on the back for ponying up money to give a man a fish rather than teach him how to fish, and I&#039;d rather see money spent on a strategy to curb emissions than one aimed at distributing aid aimed at putting off the inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a pretty strange strategy and the article you link to doesn&#8217;t give much info either&#8211;  What does this &#8216;aid&#8217; look like?  I mean, what does, &#8216;help developing countries deal with the effects of climate change&#8217; mean?  This is kind of backwards strategy if you ask me&#8211;  The developing world is responsible for about 3% of CO2 emissions worldwide yet they are affected.  Seems like Sweden (and any developed nation for that matter) OWES this kind of aid for being the polluters&#8211; not that any developed nation would admit to that.  But that said, I&#8217;m not really sure Sweden needs a pat on the back for ponying up money to give a man a fish rather than teach him how to fish, and I&#8217;d rather see money spent on a strategy to curb emissions than one aimed at distributing aid aimed at putting off the inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

